The Implication of Burwell v Hobby Lobby: Three Perspectives

Speakers

Erin Fuse Brown J.D., M.P.H., Assistant Professor of Law - Georgia State University, College of LawFollow
Anne Tucker J.D., Associate Professor of Law - Georgia State University, College of LawFollow
Eric J. Segall J.D., Kathy and Lawrence Ashe Professor of Law - Georgia State UniversityFollow

Streaming Media

Document Type

Video

Date

9-10-2014

Abstract

In Burwell v Hobby Lobby, the United States Supreme Court recognized the right of for-profit, closely held corporations to claim a religious exemption to the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive mandate under the religious Freedom Restoration Act. Our three panelists will unpack the ruling and discuss the implication of this case from the constitutional (Professor Eric Segall), corporate (Professor Anne Tucker) and health law perspectives.

Institutional Repository Citation

Erin Fuse Brown J.D., M.P.H., Anne Tucker J.D. & Eric J. Segall J.D., The Implication of Burwell v Hobby Lobby: Three Perspectives, Center for Law, Health and Society Events 33 (2014)
https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/health_events/33

Comments

External Link
Burwell_Hobby_Lobby_Link