The 25th Anniversary of the Baby Doe Rules: Perspectives from the Fields of Law, Health Care, Ethics, and Disability Policy
A highly publicized and controversial case involving the withholding of medical treatment from a “Baby Doe” with Down Syndrome gave rise in 1984 to the federal law known as the Baby Doe Rules, which went into effect the following year. The law conditions the grants if federal funds for any state’s child protective services program on the state’s assurance that it can respond to reports of medical neglect, which may include the withholding of medical treatment from disabled infants with life-threatening conditions. Leading scholars and practitioners from the fields of health care, law, ethics, and disability policy who are experts in the fields of neonatal medicine and decision-making involving very premature and other medically at risk infants will gather to provide thoughtful commentary and debate on the occasion of the 25th Anniversary of the Baby Doe rules. The Georgia State University Law Review will publish a symposium volume on the topic in Spring 2009.
Institutional Repository Citation
Charity Scott J.D., Leslie E. Wolf J.D., M.P.H., Paul R. Wolpe Ph.D., Burke J. Balch J.D., Jatinder J. Bhatia M.D., Mary Crossley J.D., Loretta M. Kopelman Ph.D., Thomas W. Mayo J.D., Mark R. Mercurio M.D., M.A., Sadath A. Sayeed M.D., J.D., Anita Silvers Ph.D., Robert D. Truog M.D., Ellen Waldman J.D., LL.M., William J. Winslade Ph.D. & Kathy Kinlaw M.Div.,
The 25th Anniversary of the Baby Doe Rules: Perspectives from the Fields of Law, Health Care, Ethics, and Disability Policy,
Center for Law, Health and Society Events