Overhyping Mass Torts for Autonomous Vehicles: Why Preempting Civil Tort Liability is Unwarranted
Publication Title
Journal of High Technology Law
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2021
Abstract
After decades of innovation and technological development, autonomous vehicles (AVs) have nearly arrived. Though AVs could create safer roads overall, these technologies will continue to pose risks and hazards in a potentially inequitable way. Under the expectation of profuse personal injury liability, commentators have recently recommended the federal government consider preempting many state tort law claims against AV developers and install an administrative compensation fund for injured victims. This article will dissect the arguments favoring tort preemption and administrative funds, finding them grounded in speculation and insufficient on normative grounds. At this juncture, the low probability of mass torts posing an existential threat to AV developers cannot justify the marginal upsides of a virtually exclusive compensation fund, which itself may disincentivize safety initiatives for AVs.
Recommended Citation
Walter G. Johnson, Overhyping Mass Torts for Autonomous Vehicles: Why Preempting Civil Tort Liability is Unwarranted, 21 J. High Tech. L. 321 (2021).
Institutional Repository Citation
Walter G. Johnson,
Overhyping Mass Torts for Autonomous Vehicles: Why Preempting Civil Tort Liability is Unwarranted,
Faculty Publications By Year
3802
(2021)
https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/faculty_pub/3802
Volume
21
Issue
2
First Page
321
Last Page
353