Interest Convergence and the Maintenance of Racial Advantage: The Case of Diversity in Higher Education
Publication Title
Journal of Social Issues
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-2024
Abstract
One of the major tenets of Critical Race Theory, the interest convergence hypothesis postulates that policies promising improvements for Black Americans are enacted only to the extent they advance White Americans’ interests. We elaborate and update Bell's argument by demonstrating that current diversity commitments in higher education are another example of interest convergence. First, we present empirical and theoretical evidence that ubiquitous approaches to diversity serve the psychological interests of White Americans more than those of Black Americans. Second, we advance a systemic framework for how social psychological processes intersect with normative ideologies in the law and in universities’ operations to facilitate the prioritization of White over Black interests. In so doing, our goal is to illuminate the primacy of White identity and power as fundamental to shaping American society's collective embrace of diversity.
Recommended Citation
Jordan G. Starck, Kyneshawau Hurd, Michael J. Perez, & Christopher K. Marshburn, Interest Convergence and the Maintenance of Racial Advantage: The Case of Diversity in Higher Education, 80 J. Soc. Issues 272 (2024).
Institutional Repository Citation
Jordan G. Starck, Kyneshawau Hurd, Michael J. Perez & Christopher K. Marshburn,
Interest Convergence and the Maintenance of Racial Advantage: The Case of Diversity in Higher Education,
Faculty Publications By Year
3761
(2024)
https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/faculty_pub/3761
DOI
10.1111/josi.12606
Volume
80
Issue
1
First Page
272
Last Page
307