Re-examining Interpersonal Source Credibility in Collaboration with Community: A Convergent Mixed Methods Study
Publication Title
Journal of Applied Communication Research
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
4-2026
Recommended Citation
Lillie D. Williamson, et al., Re-examining Interpersonal Source Credibility in Collaboration with Community: A Convergent Mixed Methods Study, 54 J. Applied Commc’n Rsch. 165 (2026).
Institutional Repository Citation
Lillie D. Williamson, Lauren A. Cafferty, Jennifer L. Waller, Leslie Wolf, Samantha R. Jones & Christy J. Ledford,
Re-examining Interpersonal Source Credibility in Collaboration with Community: A Convergent Mixed Methods Study,
Faculty Publications By Year
3750
(2026)
https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/faculty_pub/3750
DOI
10.1080/00909882.2025.2599824
Volume
54
Issue
2
First Page
165
Last Page
185
Comments
The perceived credibility of researchers has implications for how the public heeds scientific or public health recommendations and for whether individuals engage in research. As scholars have shifted attention to mass communication and computer-mediated communication, they have not continued to interrogate how communities conceptualize and evaluate interpersonal source credibility. We conducted a community-engaged, convergent mixed-methods study to investigate interpersonal source credibility in the context of communication between researchers and research participants. Results indicated that community members conceptualized interpersonal source credibility in ways not currently captured by the predominantly used measure of source credibility (e.g. expertise in understanding the community rather than formal training). Additionally, results revealed logistical issues with the use of the semantic differential scale. Findings are discussed in terms of theoretical implications for the conceptualization and measurement of interpersonal source credibility, as well as the practical implications for communication scholars and practitioners conducting research in community.