"<i>Earning Trade Secrets</i>" by Joseph P. Fishman and Deepa Varadarajan
 

Earning Trade Secrets

Publication Title

Cornell Law Review

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2024

Abstract

Every intellectual property right, like every property right generally, has a moment of birth. Whether and when that moment occurs depend on doctrines of original acquisition. In most IP regimes, these doctrines are so fundamental that they’ve been reduced to a single verb. One can get a pa-tent only by inventing, or a copyright only by authoring. The modern law of trade secrecy, however, remains strangely quiet on its own rules of original acquisition. While it asks whether the claimed information is secret enough and whether the owner is guarding that secret, it sidesteps the basic question of what that would be owner must do in order to earn legal protection in the first place.

That inattention is becoming more troubling. Firms are increasingly weaponizing the broad definition of trade secrets to assert rights over any information that they want to shield from public scrutiny, from workplace injury statistics to employee diversity data to consumer complaints. In many cases, the firm made no real effort to develop the information, and in the most egregious ones the firm would rather the in-formation not exist at all. Still, under the black letter eligibility test, it’s not clear that those facts would bar a claim.

In this Article, however, we argue that trade secrecy does indeed possess a neglected doctrine of original acquisition—and its proper application could dispose of some of these per-verse claims. In order to receive the legal entitlement, we contend, a claimant must have made some meaningful economic investment in causing the information to exist. While tying trade secret protection to development cost has a long pedigree at common law, it doesn’t get the attention it de-serves today because it’s not mentioned in any governing statute. Yet as we show, many cases nevertheless continue to treat development cost as a freestanding eligibility consideration anyway. Emphasizing investment within trade secrecy’s law of original acquisition is a policy lever hiding in plain sight within classical doctrine. While conditioning eligibility on this sort of sweat equity is famously abjured by both copyright and patent law, we explain why it makes far more sense for trade secrets.

Comments

External Links

HeinOnline

Lexis

SSRN

Westlaw

Recommended Citation

Joseph P. Fishman & Deepa Varadarajan, Earning Trade Secrets, 109 Cornell L. Rev. 1381 (2024).

Volume

109

Issue

6

First Page

1381

Last Page

1445

Link to Full Text

Share

COinS