Publication Title

Food and Drug Law Journal

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2018

Abstract

There is, without question, a public health crisis in the United States arising from both illicit and prescription opioid misuse, addiction, and overdose. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is one regulator with an important role to play in minimizing the harms associated with prescription opioids, while also ensuring that prescription opioids are available for the evidence-based management of pain. One question, however, is to what extent the agency can consider in its decisions to approve opioids and keep existing ones on the market the provider and patient behaviors contributing to the epidemic. This is, in part, because FDA’s approval of drugs is often understood as narrowly focused on weighing the benefits and risks of the products as defined in the preapproval clinical trials that are used to set the drug’s official FDA-approved indication. Such a limited focus would exclude important information about the real-world use and public-health impact of prescription opioids and other drugs with externalities. This Article argues that, to better regulate drugs like opioids that have such externalities, one step FDA should take is to use a “public health” perspective in its approval (and withdrawal) decisions. The Article describes how the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act authorizes FDA to take this broad approach in its drug approval and withdrawal decisions and offers some principles for implementing this approach systematically.

Posted with the permission of the Food and Drug Law Institute.

Comments

External Links

Westlaw

Lexis Advance

Recommended Citation

Patricia J. Zettler, Margaret Foster Riley, & Aaron S. Kesselheim, Implementing a Public Health Perspective in FDA Drug Regulation, 73 Food & Drug L.J. 221 (2018).

Volume

73

Issue

2

First Page

221

Last Page

256

Share

COinS