The Taxing Law of Taxpayer Standing

Publication Title

Tulsa Law Review

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

1-1-2008

Abstract

This article, "The Taxing Law of Taxpayer Standing," is a comprehensive exploration of the issues raised by the Supreme Court case Hein v. Freedom from Religion, et al, 551 U.S. __ (2007). The Court in Hein denied standing to federal taxpayers challenging President Bush's faith-based initiative program. This decision makes it virtually impossible for plaintiffs to challenge Executive Branch actions that allegedly violate the Establishment Clause unless Congress specifically authorized the expenditure at issue. If the President, for example, placed a permanent cross in the White House without using funds earmarked by Congress, it is unlikely anyone would have standing to challenge that decision. Hein also reaffirms the seminal taxpayer standing case, Flast v. Cohen, which has been repeatedly criticized by scholars and Supreme Court Justices. This piece details the history of the taxpayer standing question, fully discusses the Hein decision, and suggests an alternative approach to this vexing jurisdictional question.

Comments

External Links
Westlaw
Lexis Advance
SSRN

Recommended Citation

Eric J. Segall, The Taxing Law of Taxpayer Standing, 43 Tulsa L. Rev. 673 (2008).

Volume

43

Issue

3

First Page

673

Last Page

696

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS