Document Type
Article
Abstract
The theme of the 2018 Georgia State University Law Review symposium is the Future of Forensic Science Reform. In this Article, I will assess the prospects for reform through a critical evaluation of a document published in February 2018 by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), the Approved Uniform Language for Testimony and Reports for the Forensic Latent Print Discipline (ULTR).
I argue that this document provides reason to be concerned about the prospects of forensic science reform. In Part I, I discuss the background of the ULTR. In Part II, I undertake a critical evaluation of the ULTR. In the Conclusion, I discuss why the importance of the ULTR extends beyond merely one document and one discipline to implicate the future of forensic science reform more generally.
Recommended Citation
Simon A. Cole,
A Discouraging Omen: A Critical Evaluation of the Approved Uniform Language for Testimony and Reports for the Forensic Latent Print Discipline,
34
Ga. St. U. L. Rev.
1103
(2018).
Available at:
https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/gsulr/vol34/iss4/7
Included in
Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Evidence Commons, Law and Society Commons, Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons, Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons, Science and Technology Law Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons