Rush Prudential HMO v. Moran: Federal Intervention Looms as Supreme Court Rules that ERISA Does Not Preempt State Laws Requiring Independent Review of Medical Necessity Decisions and Lays Groundwork for Different Independent Review Provisions from All Fifty States

Authors

Lindsey G. Churchill

Document Type

Article

Recommended Citation

Lindsey G. Churchill, Rush Prudential HMO v. Moran: Federal Intervention Looms as Supreme Court Rules that ERISA Does Not Preempt State Laws Requiring Independent Review of Medical Necessity Decisions and Lays Groundwork for Different Independent Review Provisions from All Fifty States, 19 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. (2002).
Available at: https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/gsulr/vol19/iss2/2